History may have begun with writing, but art didn't wait that long. Consider efforts to reconstruct the earliest cave art. Then, discuss: is there a difference between painting and documentation—or between drawing and doodling? Were these early people artists? Does it matter what their intentions were?

• The article talks about a prime example of how advancements in science and technology allow us to uncover new details and secrets of our past. This discovery in Alabama has revealed ancient glyphs, giving us a glimpse into the lives and cultures of those who came before us. With every new piece of information we uncover, we gain a better understanding of our rich history and connections to the past. The process of uncovering and dating these ancient glyphs was quite a challenge. The use of photogrammetry is a clever and cost-effective tool in the field of archaeology, allowing us to digitally record and preserve precious artifacts and locations. Through this technique, we were able to reveal the true beauty and significance of these ancient glyphs, giving us a better understanding of the lives and cultures of those who created them. Further more, new technologies like reflectance transformation imaging, full body scanners, and digital image enhancement are helping reveal rock art that previously remained hidden. Rock art is found all over the world and is at least 64,000 years old, but modern humans have only discovered a tiny fraction of what's created due to things like pigment fading, thin engravings eroding, or deposits covering art. New techniques are finding rock art deep in caves as well as revealing art that was previously obscured. One example discussed was a 64,000 year old hand stencil in a cave in Spain that was only discovered through digital image manipulation.
• Is there a difference between painting and documentation? Documentation is a more objective and factual form of preserving history, as it aims to accurately record and preserve information or events. It often includes written records, photographs, or other visual documentation. On the other hand, painting is a more subjective and creative form of preserving history. It allows for self-expression and storytelling, portraying a specific message or emotion. While documentation provides us with factual information, painting adds a unique perspective and can evoke emotions and insights into the past.
• Is there a difference between drawing and doodling? Drawing is an act of creating a visual representation of something, using various techniques and materials. Doodling, on the other hand, is a form of mindless or random drawing that often lacks structure or purpose. While drawing is a skill that requires practice and technique, doodling is done as a way to pass time or relax. However, both drawing and doodling can have historical significance as they can provide insight into the thoughts and feelings of the artist during a specific time period.
• Were these early people artists? Does it matter what their intentions were? These early people were artists in their own ways. I believe that they had enough artistic instincts that allowed them to paint and do other forms of art to express themselves and tell stories. Their art provides us with a glimpse into their daily lives, beliefs, and cultures, making them important historical sources.

France's famed Lascaux Caves became so crowded with tourists there to see their breathtaking cave art that visitors risked suffocation. The French arrived at a solution: a replica next door. Is it misleading to present such recreations as valuable enough to visit in place of the original? Does it matter whether they were made by human hands or a 3D printer? And is such a replica a better solution than just limiting the number of visitors per day?

• The article linked discusses the new replica cave museum that was built next to the original Lascaux cave paintings in France. The cave paintings, which date back 20,000 years, were discovered accidentally in 1940 by four teenage boys. The cave became a popular tourist site but had to be closed in 1963 because visitors were damaging the paintings. The new replica museum was built using 3D scans to precisely copy the cave. Artists spent three years recreating the paintings. The replica aims to give visitors an experience similar to exploring the original cave.

Some art requires not replication but reconstruction every time people want to exhibit it. The Japanese Mono-Ha art movement was inspired by the collision of the natural and the mechanical worlds; many of its works were designed to deteriorate over time. Consider Phase - Mother Earth 1, by Nobuo Sekine, along with this recent recreation, then discuss: why would artists create works that aren't meant to last as long as possible? If new technology allows us to make permanent versions of them, should we?

• The Mono-Ha article: The context describes an art exhibition at the Box gallery in Los Angeles from December 2012 to January 2013 titled "Painting". It showcases works from the Japanese Mono-ha art movement from the 1960s-1970s. The works explore relationships between natural materials and industrial objects. It includes both original pieces and re-productions. The curation gives a cohesive view into this influential postwar Japanese art style.
• Phase - Mother Earth 1 article: Study the steps. Starting from the digging of the convex until finishing cylinder.